PSY FPX 6830 Assessment 2 Interview and Summary

Student Name

Capella University

PSY FPX 6830 Applied Sport Psychology

Prof. Name

Date

Interview

I initiated the discussion by exploring foundational aspects. It commenced with inquiries concerning the comprehension of sport psychology. Frequently, when I mention my degree in sport psychology, individuals seem perplexed as they lack acquaintance with the field. How do you, or would you, expound on sport psychology to others? Subsequently, in your candid evaluation, what is the principal aim of sport psychology? Do you discern any prevalent challenges within this realm? Moreover, reflecting from your initial immersion in the field to the present, have you noticed any evolution in sport psychology? In what facets? Has your viewpoint undergone any metamorphosis? Additionally, have you encountered any instances with athletes that reaffirmed your dedication to this vocation?

The subsequent segment of inquiries revolved around research and trends. The objective was to discern variances between experienced professionals and younger counterparts. Besides LinkedIn, do you utilize any other technologies in your practice? Such as social media, texting, or email? If employed in interventions, do they yield advantages, and if so, how? Furthermore, notwithstanding technological progress, have you confronted any unresolved research queries or issues? Lastly, regarding research trends, are there specific areas within sport psychology that you consider particularly pivotal compared to others?

The ensuing set of questions pertained to coaching perspectives, diversity within populations, and ethical quandaries. For example, considering your coaching roles in LI and Rochester, do you advocate for the universal adoption of certain interventions by all coaches? How would you characterize your approach toward working with diverse populations? Have you encountered any ethical dilemmas while working with athletes? If affirmative, what were they? What distinguishes the most valuable tool in youth sports from elite-level sports? When faced with ethical dilemmas, what is your initial approach to resolution? Furthermore, with the evolving landscape of LGBTQIA+ inclusivity, how has this influenced your practice? Lastly, have you faced any ethical dilemmas involving diverse populations such as age, race, skill level, or culture? If so, how did you navigate them, and did they influence your approach to working with athletes?

The concluding segment comprised rapid-fire questions aimed at eliciting succinct responses. How can sport psychology and performance be optimized? Is an advanced degree indispensable for top executives in your field? What are the primary prerequisites for success in your profession? How can one acquire further insights into this industry?

Outline

Among the myriad of inquiries, those pertaining to LGBTQ issues, coaching perspectives, and the utilization of social media platforms stood out due to their nuanced nature. Dr. Rich provided insights from both personal and professional viewpoints, prompting me to seek additional information due to the dearth of available data in these spheres. Of particular significance was the definition of sport psychology. Winter and Collins (2016) scrutinized the professional status of sport psychologists, accentuating the limitations inherent in defining the discipline. Dr. Rich echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing the necessity for further research to elucidate the essence of sport psychology to both professionals and the general populace. This newfound understanding holds promise for refining my practice, potentially ushering in fresh perspectives on the profession.

PSY FPX 6830 Assessment 2 Interview and Summary

Limitations

One aspect that piqued my interest was Dr. Rich’s ethical decision-making process. While he couldn’t recall specific ethical dilemmas, his stance on LGBTQ issues exhibited a dual perspective. From a practitioner perspective, he advocated against discrimination, yet from a personal and coaching viewpoint, he supported certain regulations. This ethical duality mirrors findings by Sharp and Hodge (2013), who delineated crucial components for nurturing effective sport psychology relationships. Despite the emphasis on trust and professional knowledge, Dr. Rich’s stance underscores the potential conflict between practitioner obligations and coaching priorities. Although the research underscores the significance of these components in fostering professional relationships, the variance in decision-making between practitioners and coaches necessitates further exploration.

References

Association for Applied Sport Psychology. (2022). Ethics code: AASP ethical principles and standards. http://www.appliedsportpsych.org/about/ethics/ethics-code/

Sharp, L., & Hodge, K. (2013). Effective sport psychology consulting relationships: Two coach case studies. The Sport Psychologist, 27(4), 313–324.

PSY FPX 6830 Assessment 2 Interview and Summary

Winter, S., & Collins, D. J. (2016). Applied sport psychology: A profession? The Sport Psychologist, 30(1), 89–96.