NUR 598 Week 6 Poster Presentation
Student Name
University of Phoenix
NUR 598 Research Utilization Project (capstone-style project)
Prof. Name
Date
Nurse Practitioner in Triage to Reduce Emergency Department Crowding
Emergency department (ED) crowding can be reduced by placing a Nurse Practitioner (NP) in the triage process. An NP-led triage model allows earlier patient assessment, faster diagnostic workups, timely treatment initiation, and quicker discharge for eligible patients. Evidence suggests this approach can improve patient flow, shorten waiting times, reduce the number of patients leaving without being seen (LWBS), and increase overall patient satisfaction while maintaining safe, high-quality care.
Understanding Emergency Department Crowding
Emergency department crowding is a persistent healthcare challenge that affects hospitals worldwide. As patient volumes continue to rise, many EDs struggle to provide timely care due to limited resources, staffing shortages, and insufficient inpatient bed availability.
Several factors contribute to overcrowding, including:
Increasing emergency department visits each year
Shortage of primary care providers
Growing inpatient admissions
Limited availability of inpatient beds
Legal obligations under EMTALA requiring emergency stabilization and treatment
These issues delay patient care and place significant pressure on emergency clinicians.
Impact of Emergency Department Crowding
Overcrowded emergency departments negatively affect both patients and healthcare organizations.
Common consequences include:
Longer waiting times for critically ill patients
Ambulance diversion
Increased risk of medical errors
Higher rates of patients leaving without treatment
Extended emergency department length of stay
Poor patient outcomes
Increased mortality risk
Lower patient satisfaction scores
Improving patient throughput is essential to delivering safer, more efficient emergency care.
How a Nurse Practitioner in Triage Improves Patient Flow
Introducing a Nurse Practitioner into the triage area enables qualified providers to begin patient care immediately rather than waiting for an available emergency physician.
Responsibilities of the triage Nurse Practitioner include:
Performing rapid clinical assessments
Ordering diagnostic tests
Initiating evidence-based treatment
Managing patients with Emergency Severity Index (ESI) Level 2 and Level 3 conditions
Treating and safely discharging appropriate low-acuity patients
Coordinating care with physicians and nursing staff
Early intervention reduces unnecessary delays and improves overall emergency department efficiency.
Project Objectives
The primary objective of implementing an NP-led triage model is to improve patient throughput while maintaining high standards of clinical care.
Specific objectives include:
Improve triage efficiency
Reduce emergency department crowding
Initiate treatment earlier
Optimize resource utilization
Enhance patient safety and satisfaction
Expected Goals
The proposed intervention aims to achieve measurable improvements across several emergency department performance indicators.
Expected outcomes include:
Reduced emergency department length of stay
Shorter time from patient arrival to provider assessment
Fewer patients leaving without being seen (LWBS)
Higher patient satisfaction scores
Improved clinical workflow
Faster diagnosis and treatment
Note: The original project presented projected outcomes rather than actual clinical results.
Implementation Strategy
Successful implementation requires collaboration among clinical leadership, emergency department staff, and hospital administration.
Key implementation steps include:
Form a multidisciplinary implementation team
Develop standardized policies and procedures
Train physicians, nurse practitioners, and nursing staff
Evaluate staff competency before launch
Prepare the physical triage area to support expanded clinical activities
Monitor performance metrics throughout implementation
Overcoming Barriers to Change
Healthcare organizations often face challenges when introducing new clinical workflows. Common barriers include limited budgets, staffing shortages, high patient acuity, and resistance to change.
Using Lewin’s Change Theory, hospitals can increase staff engagement by:
Involving frontline staff throughout implementation
Providing ongoing education and evidence supporting the change
Encouraging feedback and collaboration
Offering leadership support during transition
Recognizing and celebrating implementation successes
Staff participation improves acceptance and long-term sustainability.
Evaluating Project Success
The effectiveness of an NP triage model should be measured using objective quality indicators.
Important performance measures include:
Emergency department length of stay
Time from arrival to provider evaluation
Number of patients leaving without being seen
Patient satisfaction scores
Staff feedback
Operational efficiency
Continuous monitoring helps determine whether modifications are needed.
Maintaining Long-Term Success
If performance metrics demonstrate meaningful improvement, healthcare organizations should integrate the NP triage model into routine emergency department operations.
Long-term sustainability includes:
Making updated policies permanent
Continuing quality improvement monitoring
Reporting outcomes to hospital leadership
Sharing successful results with professional organizations
Publishing findings in peer-reviewed healthcare journals
Hospitals may also expand the model into additional patient care pathways after reviewing new evidence.
What If the Project Does Not Produce Desired Results?
Not every quality improvement initiative achieves immediate success. If performance indicators worsen or fail to improve, the implementation team should reassess the intervention.
Recommended actions include:
Review stakeholder participation
Gather feedback from staff and patients
Reevaluate workflow processes
Conduct an updated literature review
Follow the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to redesign the project
If evidence shows the intervention is ineffective or creates unintended consequences, discontinuing the project remains an acceptable evidence-based decision. Even unsuccessful initiatives contribute valuable knowledge for future healthcare improvement efforts.
Communicating Project Outcomes
Transparent communication encourages organizational learning and supports continuous improvement.
Within the Hospital
Project updates should include:
Weekly implementation meetings
Department-wide progress reports
Leadership briefings
Quality improvement committee reviews
Outside the Hospital
Successful projects should be shared through:
Peer-reviewed journal publications
Professional nursing organizations
Healthcare conferences
Hospital system leadership
Disseminating findings allows other healthcare organizations to evaluate and adopt effective emergency department strategies.
Key Evidence at a Glance
Research consistently indicates that incorporating advanced practice providers into emergency department triage can:
Reduce waiting times before provider evaluation.
Improve emergency department patient flow.
Lower the number of patients leaving without being seen.
Increase patient satisfaction.
Support earlier diagnosis and treatment initiation.
Enhance operational efficiency without compromising patient safety.
Healthcare organizations should evaluate local staffing, patient volume, and available resources before implementing an NP-led triage model.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does having a Nurse Practitioner in triage reduce emergency department crowding?
Yes. Studies indicate that Nurse Practitioners can improve patient flow by performing early assessments, ordering diagnostic tests, initiating treatment, and managing appropriate patients before physician evaluation.
What are the benefits of NP-led triage?
Major benefits include shorter wait times, reduced emergency department length of stay, fewer patients leaving without treatment, improved patient satisfaction, and more efficient use of healthcare resources.
Which patients can a Nurse Practitioner manage during triage?
Depending on hospital protocols and scope of practice, Nurse Practitioners commonly evaluate patients with Emergency Severity Index (ESI) Level 2 and Level 3 conditions, initiate diagnostic workups, begin treatment, and discharge appropriate low-acuity patients.
What implementation model supports this practice change?
The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice provides a structured framework for implementing, evaluating, and sustaining evidence-based quality improvement initiatives such as NP-led triage.
How should hospitals measure the success of NP triage?
Hospitals should monitor emergency department length of stay, time to provider assessment, patient satisfaction, rates of patients leaving without being seen, workflow efficiency, and overall clinical outcomes.
References
American College of Emergency Physicians. (2011). Definition of boarded patient. https://www.acep.org/clinical—practice-management/definition-of-boarded-patient/
Barish, R. A., McGaughey, P. L., & Arnold, T. C. (2012). Emergency room crowding: A marker of hospital health. Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 123, 304–311. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3540619/
Bernstein, S. L., Aronsky, D., Duseja, R., Epstein, S., Handel, D., Hwang, U., et al. (2009). The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. Academic Emergency Medicine, 16(1), 1–10. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00295.x
Doody, C. M., & Doody, O. (2011). Introducing evidence into practice: Using the Iowa Model. British Journal of Nursing, 20(11), 661–664. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51466031_Introducing_evidence_into_nursing_practice_Using_the_IOWA_model
Government Accountability Office. (2009). Hospital emergency departments: Crowding continues to occur, and some patients wait longer than recommended time frames. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-09-347
NUR 598 Week 6 Poster Presentation
Harding, K. E., Taylor, N. F., & Leggat, S. G. (2011). Do triage systems in healthcare improve patient flow? A systematic review. Australian Health Review, 35(3), 371–383.
Rowe, B. H., Guo, X., Villa-Roel, C., Schull, M., Holroyd, B., Bullard, M., et al. (2011). The role of triage liaison physicians on mitigating overcrowding in emergency departments: A systematic review. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00984.x
Stover-Baker, B., Stahlman, B., & Pollack, M. (2012). Triage nurse prediction of hospital admission. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 38(3), 306–310.
Titler, M. G., Kleiber, C., Steelman, V. J., Rakel, B. A., Budreau, G., Everett, L. Q., et al. (2002). The Iowa Model of evidence-based practice to promote quality care. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 13(4), 497–509. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11580356_The_Iowa_Model_of_Evidence_Based_Practice_to_Promote_Quality_Care
White, B. A., Brown, D. F., Sinclair, J., Chang, Y., Carignan, S., McIntyre, J., & Biddinger, P. D. (2012). Supplemented triage and rapid treatment (START) improves performance measures in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 42(3), 322–328.
Get University of Phoenix Free BSN Samples
NURS-FPX4000
- NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 5 Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue/ Annonated Bibliography and Kaltura Video
- NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Ethics in Healthcare Exam
- NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles Exam
- NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 2 Applying Research Skills Exams
- Assessment 4 Activity: Exam: Ethics in Healthcare
- Assessment 3 Activity: Exam: Applying Ethical Principles
- Assessment 2 Activity: Exam 1: Information Literacy and Library Research Skills
- NURS FPX 4000 Assignment 4 DEI and Ethics in Healthcare
- NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 5
- NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 3
NURS-FPX4005
- NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation
- NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 3 Managing Human and Financial Resources Exam
- NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 2 Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Professionalism Exam
- NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 1 Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Exams
- NURS FPX 4005 Assignment 1 Collaboration and Leadership Reflection
- NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 5
- NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 4
- NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 3
- NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 2
- NURS FPX 4005 Assessment 1
NURS-FPX4015
NURS-FPX4025
NURS-FPX4035
NURS-FPX4045
NURS-FPX4055
NURS-FPX4065
NURS-FPX4905