Online Class Assignment

NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

nurs fpx 4030 assessment 2 determining the credibility of evidence and resources

NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Student Name

Capella University

NURS-FPX 4030 Making Evidence-Based Decisions

Prof. Name:

Date

Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

This research study focuses on the selection of chosen diagnoses that could benefit from an evidence-based approach. The research study also emphasizes on the criteria on which credibility of a source is measured. The credibility and relevance of evidence and resources regarding quality and safety issues will be analyzed. The significance of inculcating the credibles sources will also be discussed. Furthermore, the an evidence-based practice framework will also be assessed to lookafter the health care and safety concerns.

Surgical Site Infections

Surgical site infections are an infection that develops after surgery on the area where the operation is performed (Thirukumaran et al., 2019). Surgical site infections are some of the most frequent illnesses related to the healthcare system, they can cause severe outcomes and mortalities. Surgical site infections are sometimes superficial and only involve the outer skin. Other surgical site infections are more lethal and affect the tissues under the skin and organs.

The Benefit of Applying an Evidence-Based Approach

The progress in the field of research led to a significant change in the healthcare system. To cater to the changing nature of the disease, a new framework for the healthcare system has been designed. The selection of evidence-based approaches for the treatment of surgical site infections may be difficult for nurses holding bachelor’s degrees. Consequently, the nurses find it hard to search for online credible sources. NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources. The primary purpose of this research is to help nurses gain information and skills for the assessment of credibility of sources. Their these skills will aid them to lookafter patient care as well. The evidence-based approach is the careful, deliberate, and sensible utilization of the most reliable evidence available in decision-making. It is the incorporation of reliable information from a valid source with practical experience, and it also optimizes patient outcomes. As an evidence-based approach provides credible and accurate information, so applying this approach to the chosen diagnoses greatly helps in the correct evaluation of results.

Establishing the Criteria for Determining Credibility

Focussing on specific criteria is crucial for assessing the credibility of various sources, such as scholarly articles or websites. The CRAAP test is the best option to check the credibility of the resources. This guarantees that the content and the website are accurate and relevant. When it comes to a selection of trustworthy sources for the diagnosis and treatment of surgical site infections, a medical specialist article should be preferred (Musgrove et al., 2018).  These criteria for CRAAP comprise currency, relevancy, authority, accuracy, and objectivity. The source must be written by a specialist in a certain field of study and must have been written and published within the last fast years. Peer review is crucial for academic work and the information offered should be relevant, accurate, and up-to-date. Additionally, journal articles must have a logical framework, and quality is determined by the strength of the supporting evidence.

NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Several factors must be kept in mind before assigning an evidence-based approach to surgical site infections. Difficulties after surgery may lead to expensive hospital readmission and unsatisfied patients, and post-surgical complications. Reducing post-operative problems, and improving health and economical issues may be possible with the use of Tele-Health technology (Mousa et al., 2019). This technology is used to monitor patients online without the need for physical presence. By employing tablets or other devices to transfer voice, emails, text messages, and videos, the modern telehealth approach has been used. Telehealth is still growing and has expanded into a more extensive field of patient care that also incorporates artificial intelligence and telecommunication.

Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Online tutorials can be found in different formats, but most of them are multimedia based. It comprises videos, images, and graphic interchange formats. Most nurses were more satisfied with such types of interactive platforms (Olsen & Harlow, 2022).  Nurses should avoid Wikipedia articles, as they can be written and modified by anyone. The information in such articles is also biased. They also avoid websites with about.com domains. This is because the data on such websites usually comes from online searches, and they also do not properly cite the resources.

Among all the resources, the review article named (AAOS Systematic Literature Review: Summary on the Management of Surgical Site Infections) is the most credible resource. The research of Ariyo et al. (2019) follows the CRAAP criteria. According to the CRAAP test, this article is not older than five years. This article is a reliable source as it is easy to navigate and offers access to a wide range of content regarding surgical site infections (SSIs). This article is published in a peer-reviewed journal that is Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology (ICHE) and this journal maintains its database constantly, proving the legitimacy and relevance of resources and contains up-to-date reports and statistics. This article was written by an expert in the field which proves its authority and accuracy. This article provides detailed data about surgical site infections that proves its purpose.

Unlock this document FREE

to view all pages

Credibility and Relevance of Evidence and Resources

Several scientific research supports the credibility of evidence-based practice, in the treatment of certain diseases. To address specific healthcare challenges, the evidence-based practice model specifies the incorporation of the most optimal procedures and treatments. Medical staff uses a variety of evidence-based approaches to address the issue of avoiding surgical site infections. If the studies are based on controlled trials and systematic reviews, their results are more reliable and accurate to professionals than those of general reviews.

NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

The credible resources are the Wiley Online Library, the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, the Journal of Surgery, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology (ICHE) Journal, the International Journal of Evidence-Based Nursing, and the Journal of the American Society for Microbiology. These resources have been chosen based on their importance to patients and nurses. Many online databases such as the web of science, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, and CINAHL may also provide proof. These are credible resources as they provide professional data that is available online. The data is easy to understand and updated on yearly basis.

The Importance of Incorporating Credible Evidence into an Evidenced-Based Practice Model

Healthcare workers and nurses use a variety of valid scientific methods to the problem of preventing surgical site infections in the healthcare system. An evidence-based model named The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-based Practice (JHNEBP) Model, accompanied by practical tools that may be employed by a person or a group, plays a vital role in problem-solving for medical judgment (Liza Anicoche & Kaiser, 2021). This process is help to utilize practice question, evidence and translation model. This model was cerated to help nurses and health practitionars. The fundamental objective of the strategy is to ensure that patients receive the best care and the most recent scientific innovations as quickly and precisely as appropriate. The strategy aims to make sure that patient treatment is swiftly and correctly updated under the best research and medical standards currently available. Similarly, by sharing more information on the management of surgical site infections, the Johns Hopkins Model improves the quality of healthcare and public security.

Capella 4030 Assessment 2

The JHNEBP method offers a framework and direction through qualitative research to construct an evidence-based plan for improvement, making it appropriate for the management of surgical site infections. To ensure that the researched data gathered is of the highest quality and that the necessary preliminary actions have been carried out to achieve an evidence-based change, an evidence-based model is utilized to provide structure to the process of change. Capella 4030 Assessment 2. The EBP model provides the framework for possible EBP patient care.

Evidence-based practice (EBP), allows therapists to only use treatments that have been verified by research as a standard in the healthcare system. The review article published by the Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology (ICHE) recommends that factors causing surgical site infections are Anemia, obesity, depression, history of alcohol abuse, immunosuppressive medications, dementia, etc (Ariyo et al., 2019). Capella 4030 Assessment 2. To lower the risk of surgical site infections, the World Health Organization (WHO) highly advised the use of a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in adult patients receiving general anesthesia (de Jonge et al., 2019).

Conclusion

The utilization of evidence-based approaches that are supported by reliable and accurate sources is very crucial for getting the desired outcomes in the treatment of surgical site infections. The above-mentioned strategies and evidence-based models are very beneficial to patients suffering from surgical site infections. However, nurses and other healthcare practitioners must look for credible resources and evaluate those before using them. To identify the most reliable resources, the John Hopkins model can be useful.

References

Ariyo, P., Zayed, B., Riese, V., Anton, B., Latif, A., Kilpatrick, C., Allegranzi, B., & Berenholtz, S. (2019). Implementation strategies to reduce surgical site infections: A systematic review. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 40(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2018.355

de Jonge, S., Egger, M., Latif, A., Loke, Y. K., Berenholtz, S., Boermeester, M., Allegranzi, B., & Solomkin, J. (2019). Effectiveness of 80% vs 30–35% fraction of inspired oxygen in patients undergoing surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 122(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.024

Liza Anicoche, P. I. M., & Kaiser, C.-I. L. (2021). The Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice (EBP) model: Weinberg peri-anesthesia interventions for a healing Environment. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 36(4), e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2021.06.064

Mousa, A. Y., Broce, M., Monnett, S., Davis, E., McKee, B., & Lucas, B. D. (2019). Results of telehealth electronic monitoring for post-discharge complications and surgical site infections following arterial revascularization with groin incision. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 57, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2018.09.023

Musgrove, A. T., Powers, J. R., Rebar, L. C., & Musgrove, G. J. (2018). Real or fake? Resources for teaching college students how to identify fake news. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2018.1480444

Olsen, R., & Harlow, S. (2022). Creating library tutorials to provide flexibility and customized learning in asynchronous settings. Public Services Quarterly, 18(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2021.1896413

Thirukumaran, C. P., Zaman, A., Rubery, P. T., Calabria, C., Li, Y., Ricciardi, B. F., Bakhsh, W. R., & Kautz, H. (2019). Natural language processing for the identification of surgical site infections in orthopedics. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 101(24), 2167–2174. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.19.00661